Monday, November 26, 2012

Local Music

I was thinking about the various musical 'trends' that have popped up, and then either died out or evolved, since I have started playing in local bands (about 2005). I really didn't have many words to contribute to this, so I will go ahead and submit, for your viewing pleasure, this chart:

(Right click, then choose 'view image' so you can actually read what it says)

The chart implies that most local musicians in your area are probably either in a metal band or a hipster band, or they are a rapper; and while this is probably true, there are several grey areas, those being the subgenres and more specific styles in the smaller circles. There is also the simultaneously changing-yet-stagnant subject that is pop-punk, which I will describe later on.

Another thing that needs to be mentioned: double-lines represent genres that can co-exist together, so to speak. Whereas goth will usually end up conforming to the generic understanding of 'metal', technical metal bands tend to remain their own breed. Think of the kid who always played Eruption or the Crazy Train solo in high school; he's probably still playing Eruption or the Crazy Train solo in a seedy downtown bar, whereas the goth kid you knew probably ditched the Marilyn Manson outfit and joined a metalcore band.

So, while we're on the subject of metal, let's discuss its branches:

Post-grunge:

Tortured young adults find solace in tortured rich guys and start their own ripoff of Alice in Chains. While some bands stick it out, many of them realize that post-grunge is 'post' for a reason and devolve into generic metal.

This would generally be the middle ground between a band ditching its post-grunge roots and settling into its metal niche.

Juggalos/Nu-metal:

Fairly self-explanatory. One would think that this style died out a decade ago, but there are still a lot of diehards out there. No, KoRn and ICP don't have that much in common, but for the purposes of this post, they are close enough.

Goth:

Again, self-explanatory. Most people who could be listed among the above categories have since been assimilated into the metal culture, which can be summarized thusly:

METAL:

Technical Metal/Shredders:

Technical metal can be the next step for generic metalheads (Tool being a common introduction), but it can also exist as its own entity.

Hardcore/Metalcore:

This is essentially the connecting link between metal and pop-punk. Some bands are more based in metal:

While others find their roots based in punk:

Pop-Punk:

We all know the popular, classic pop-punk bands, and while there are many bands who stick with that style, I picked a band that demonstrates the evolution from pop-punk and emo into hipster music:

Ska, Rockabilly and Country are also pretty self-explanatory so examples aren't really necessary. Ska is kind of a detour between pop-punk and hipster music, and oddly enough, a lot of local rockabilly bands I've seen (not there have been that many) seemed to have branched out of the ska side of things, though they end up being their own entity entirely. Country (meaning a classic country, rather than pop-country, sound) and rockabilly also co-exist easily, as they always have.

HIPSTER BANDS:

Of course, 'hipster band' can mean one of many, many things, and it's rather unfair and dickish of me to use it to my advantage, but oh well. A lot of local hipster bands usually try to sound like a distant descendant of this:

Or this:

And for a more modern example:

Many hipster bands either seem to stay in this style, while starting side projects to appease their other, less hip interests ('Check out my ironic rockabilly/ambient/classic rock/punk band that will last for the next two weeks!'); the remainder drift into one of the following two categories:

Electronic:

In trying to find the hippest, most obscure bands, one may stumble upon Joy Division, who seem to be a common entry into making electronic music (and their 8.5 million views can attest to their obscurity):

Either way, that usually leads to this:

'Electronic' is also an extremely vague term, so to clarify, this also includes any sort of 'club'-type music, including dubstep, and your very white friend attempting to become a DJ.

Indie Folk:

There may come a time in a man's life when he chooses to grow a giant, unruly beard, contrary to his urban, collegiate, non-lumberjack lifestyle; around that time, he may discover how the modern man can express his emotions via indie folk. Mumford and Sons are a common entry group:

The core of indie folk can be summarised thusly:

The remaining genres on the chart (Rap, Reggae, Jam Bands) are self-explanatory. Rap/Hip-Hop is very much its own culture on the local level, with the exception of interest from some members of the metal and hipster communities. While it may seem that the chart suggests that jam bands are eventually assimilated into the reggae culture, which is then assimilated into rap, this isn't necessarily true. All three are very much their own cultures; however, jam bands (or 'hippie bands') have a lot in common with reggae groups (for obvious reasons), and reggae/rap collaborations are extremely common, though the two can exist and thrive separately as well. The same can apply to the reggae/electronic connection, as well as rap/electronic. The gray line between rap and electronic suggests that while you don't see many rappers putting out chiptune albums, the two groups have a close and important connection that is different than, say, pop punk and hardcore.

Of course, this really only applies to local music as I've seen it; it's not a history of music since the dawn of time. Also there are some bands who don't easily fit into the aforementioned categories, as well as genres that aren't popular enough around here to be mentioned: for instance, there is no doom metal scene around here, or jazz fusion, or trip-hop, etc. Still, I think what I've compiled is fairly accurate. I will add to it or change it if needed.

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Rhiannon

This is my first Twaddle post in a year and a half. It doesn't seem like it was that long ago. I was 21 when I last Twaddled; now I'm 23. The following paragraph does not matter in any way, since Whitney is the only person who will read this, and even she may not read it.

Since the last time I posted on Twaddle I continued ranting on other areas of the internet. Whitney and I did Mumblepod for a few months, which was a homemade radio show where we had a different 'theme' every night, picked a dozen or so songs that fit said theme, and talked about them, with some healthy doses of self-deprecating humor. Then we missed one week because of unfortunate scheduling and never returned as of this moment. That was already about 11 months ago. Then I wrote some 'reviews' on Rateyourmusic, which I still do here and there. I put quotes on 'reviews' because rather than any critique, it's basically Twaddle (it's all just how I talk... it's all relative, man) on a website that actually receives hits. I had two reviews featured on the front page: one for Bad Company's debut album (the first post I submitted) and one for Sly Stone's High on You. That means nothing, and is even more sad when you (I) take into account that not only will no one care about any of that, but no one will even read it... but I thought it was cool, at least. Anyway, as my Rateyourmusic posts are basically Twaddle, but for albums instead of songs, I may start posting them here sometime to get this blog running again. Or I will post this and forget about it.

*****

Anyway, the whole point of this post is, there is a Fleetwood Mac tribute album coming out soon. For some reason, it's been on my mind a lot, which is weird since I usually couldn't care less about this kind of stuff. As of now, seven of the seventeen tracks are available on the official page.

The interesting thing about this album is that there are quite a few 'hip' acts contributing. You know, 'indie pop', whatever that is. Rather fittingly, then, many of the covers are from the Tusk album, which is sort of like Fleetwood Mac's 'indie' sounding album, decades before that sound existed. I'm mostly indifferent towards most of what I've heard, other than Karen Elson's frightening, beautiful version of Gold Dust Woman and Billy Gibbons' (!) acoustic, vaguely stoner rock cover of Oh Well. I know nothing about Lykki Li other than the fact that her name is hilarious, and that her Silver Springs cover is alright but abuses the echo chamber effect more than anything else I have ever heard, in true indie fashion I guess... and the MGMT cover of Future Games is hilarious in the most deadly serious, 'artistic', never-ending way. I'm glad they included a Bob Welch song on the album, though.

The weirdest cover, to me, was Best Coast's version of Rhiannon. I still am not sure who Best Coast are. I always get them mixed up with Beach House. I probably wouldn't have so much trouble if I cared more. Whoever they are, I don't really care for their take on Rhiannon, and even though I'm glad the chick is a huge fan (and I can kinda see where she's coming from, according to an article I will post later) I think they missed the point and vibe of the original song. But what do I know, they're an underground sensation, apparently; and I'm ranting on my blog with two followers, both of which are defunct accounts.

Stevie Nicks wrote Rhiannon a few months before she and Lindsey Buckingham joined Fleetwood Mac. The story is, she read the name in a book, liked the name enough to write a song based around the name 'in ten minutes', later finding out the name Rhiannon originated with a Welsh witch/goddess with the name, and that her lyrics fit the description of said witch perfectly.

This is the very first live performance of Rhiannon, by Buckingham Nicks in late 1974, before they joined Fleetwood Mac.

Fleetwood Mac recorded Rhiannon for their first album with their new lineup (the regulars - Fleetwood and the McVies - and Buckingham/Nicks) and even though it seems to have already been near-perfected in the BN days, the final studio version adds a different edge to the song, replacing the threatening pagan stomping of the BN version with a Californian, jazzy backing that sounds like the soundtrack to a succubus encounter. Both approaches fit the lyrics perfectly, yet in different ways.

Studio version. This was the first song on a FM album to showcase the three part harmonies of Stevie, Lindsey and Christine McVie, mainly in the chorus. That part never gets old. It just sounds so BIG.

'Single version' - The mix is oh so slightly different, most notably on the lead guitar stuff during the choruses. I hear this version on what used to be the oldies/soft rock station.

Just guitar and vocals (again, listen to those harmonies in the chorus, and Stevie's own high harmonies in the second verse). The multitracks for this song are out there, but besides this video I don't think they're on Youtube yet.

I guess Rhiannon was kind of the beginning of Stevie Nicks developing her dark, 'witchy' style. I remember watching an interview where she felt kind of useless in the band at first, as she was kind of added as an afterthought (the band was mainly after Lindsey Buckingham), being the only member of a five piece/three lead vocal band who didn't play an instrument onstage, and had to find a way to coexist without becoming obsolete, too flashy/showy, or overshadowing Christine McVie, the other female in the band (since women in bands were often seen as more of a novelty than just a part of life). In that sense, Rhiannon kind of hinted towards some of her darker songs, like Gold Dust Woman, Sisters of the Moon, etc.

It seems like immediately after Fleetwood Mac started touring with this lineup (which, of course, later became known as the Rumours lineup), Rhiannon became one of their live highlights, and Stevie's showcase of sorts. Where the studio version has a mellow, sort of mournful guitar solo after the "taken by the sky" section, during live performances it turns into a violent guitar freakout before winding down for the 'dreams unwind love's a state of mind' part. On the studio version it fades out here, and live... well:

By far the best live version of Rhiannon I've ever seen, and they're all pretty amazing to begin with.

So anyway, Rhiannon was the song that finally made the band superstars, everybody knows it and loves it, millions of old women dress like Stevie Nicks because of it, and you already know all of that. I guess one of those Stevie Nicks superfans eventually gave birth to the girl from Best Coast, who is a huge fan herself. I can't fault this broad for saying things like "I'm sure Fleetwood Mac are aware this record is happening. Maybe they'll hear it and think it's cool, and then Stevie Nicks will want to be my best friend", and her comment that she prefers covers that aren't exactly like the original is appreciated. But I'm a dick and I don't like their cover.

Here is a list, in no particular order, of my favorite aspects of the original, never mind all the extra stuff they did live:

- The guitar riff (I've read that Stevie came up with it; who knows for sure)
- The way the bass acts as a counter-melody to the guitar
- The almost off-beat drums, in typical Mick Fleetwood fashion
- The jazzy, sensual keyboard in the background throughout the song
- The switch from minor to major, and back again, through the 'all your life...' part
- The famous high note in the aforementioned section ('all your life')
- The chorus harmonies, and the high wordless harmonies in the verses and outro

This cover has none of these things. I understand the desire to rework the song, so not every part has to be the same, but the Best Coast cover is three chords, C-F-G, all the way through. No A minor anywhere (the chord that most of the melody is in), no "minor fall, major lift", nothing... all played through the track's three minutes in an annoying staccato rhythm that is in just about every 'indie pop' song out there. At the very end, the drums switch from the relentless 'boom-tch-boom-tch' to a rhythm closer to that of Mick Fleetwood's, so there is that. Otherwise, I appreciate Best Coast's love for Fleetwood Mac, but their cover kind of represents everything I hate about that style of music, from the whimsical, playful, 'artsy' side of indie bullcrap (the MGMT cover of Future Games representing everything I hate about the pretentious 'artsy' side of indie bullcrap) I definitely prefer the original Rhiannon. But at least it's better than this:

It's just so bad. Why did this happen.

While reading about Rhiannon on Wikipedia, I found out that apparently Hole covered it or something. I didn't listen to it. Bob Welch, of all people, recorded a cover for an album around 2006 or so. I cannot find it anymore but I remember it was pretty interesting. The music was almost trip hop and his voice had a weird vocoder-type effect.

Anyway, twaddle. See you in a year and a half.