Monday, November 26, 2012

Local Music

I was thinking about the various musical 'trends' that have popped up, and then either died out or evolved, since I have started playing in local bands (about 2005). I really didn't have many words to contribute to this, so I will go ahead and submit, for your viewing pleasure, this chart:

(Right click, then choose 'view image' so you can actually read what it says)

The chart implies that most local musicians in your area are probably either in a metal band or a hipster band, or they are a rapper; and while this is probably true, there are several grey areas, those being the subgenres and more specific styles in the smaller circles. There is also the simultaneously changing-yet-stagnant subject that is pop-punk, which I will describe later on.

Another thing that needs to be mentioned: double-lines represent genres that can co-exist together, so to speak. Whereas goth will usually end up conforming to the generic understanding of 'metal', technical metal bands tend to remain their own breed. Think of the kid who always played Eruption or the Crazy Train solo in high school; he's probably still playing Eruption or the Crazy Train solo in a seedy downtown bar, whereas the goth kid you knew probably ditched the Marilyn Manson outfit and joined a metalcore band.

So, while we're on the subject of metal, let's discuss its branches:

Post-grunge:

Tortured young adults find solace in tortured rich guys and start their own ripoff of Alice in Chains. While some bands stick it out, many of them realize that post-grunge is 'post' for a reason and devolve into generic metal.

This would generally be the middle ground between a band ditching its post-grunge roots and settling into its metal niche.

Juggalos/Nu-metal:

Fairly self-explanatory. One would think that this style died out a decade ago, but there are still a lot of diehards out there. No, KoRn and ICP don't have that much in common, but for the purposes of this post, they are close enough.

Goth:

Again, self-explanatory. Most people who could be listed among the above categories have since been assimilated into the metal culture, which can be summarized thusly:

METAL:

Technical Metal/Shredders:

Technical metal can be the next step for generic metalheads (Tool being a common introduction), but it can also exist as its own entity.

Hardcore/Metalcore:

This is essentially the connecting link between metal and pop-punk. Some bands are more based in metal:

While others find their roots based in punk:

Pop-Punk:

We all know the popular, classic pop-punk bands, and while there are many bands who stick with that style, I picked a band that demonstrates the evolution from pop-punk and emo into hipster music:

Ska, Rockabilly and Country are also pretty self-explanatory so examples aren't really necessary. Ska is kind of a detour between pop-punk and hipster music, and oddly enough, a lot of local rockabilly bands I've seen (not there have been that many) seemed to have branched out of the ska side of things, though they end up being their own entity entirely. Country (meaning a classic country, rather than pop-country, sound) and rockabilly also co-exist easily, as they always have.

HIPSTER BANDS:

Of course, 'hipster band' can mean one of many, many things, and it's rather unfair and dickish of me to use it to my advantage, but oh well. A lot of local hipster bands usually try to sound like a distant descendant of this:

Or this:

And for a more modern example:

Many hipster bands either seem to stay in this style, while starting side projects to appease their other, less hip interests ('Check out my ironic rockabilly/ambient/classic rock/punk band that will last for the next two weeks!'); the remainder drift into one of the following two categories:

Electronic:

In trying to find the hippest, most obscure bands, one may stumble upon Joy Division, who seem to be a common entry into making electronic music (and their 8.5 million views can attest to their obscurity):

Either way, that usually leads to this:

'Electronic' is also an extremely vague term, so to clarify, this also includes any sort of 'club'-type music, including dubstep, and your very white friend attempting to become a DJ.

Indie Folk:

There may come a time in a man's life when he chooses to grow a giant, unruly beard, contrary to his urban, collegiate, non-lumberjack lifestyle; around that time, he may discover how the modern man can express his emotions via indie folk. Mumford and Sons are a common entry group:

The core of indie folk can be summarised thusly:

The remaining genres on the chart (Rap, Reggae, Jam Bands) are self-explanatory. Rap/Hip-Hop is very much its own culture on the local level, with the exception of interest from some members of the metal and hipster communities. While it may seem that the chart suggests that jam bands are eventually assimilated into the reggae culture, which is then assimilated into rap, this isn't necessarily true. All three are very much their own cultures; however, jam bands (or 'hippie bands') have a lot in common with reggae groups (for obvious reasons), and reggae/rap collaborations are extremely common, though the two can exist and thrive separately as well. The same can apply to the reggae/electronic connection, as well as rap/electronic. The gray line between rap and electronic suggests that while you don't see many rappers putting out chiptune albums, the two groups have a close and important connection that is different than, say, pop punk and hardcore.

Of course, this really only applies to local music as I've seen it; it's not a history of music since the dawn of time. Also there are some bands who don't easily fit into the aforementioned categories, as well as genres that aren't popular enough around here to be mentioned: for instance, there is no doom metal scene around here, or jazz fusion, or trip-hop, etc. Still, I think what I've compiled is fairly accurate. I will add to it or change it if needed.

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Rhiannon

This is my first Twaddle post in a year and a half. It doesn't seem like it was that long ago. I was 21 when I last Twaddled; now I'm 23. The following paragraph does not matter in any way, since Whitney is the only person who will read this, and even she may not read it.

Since the last time I posted on Twaddle I continued ranting on other areas of the internet. Whitney and I did Mumblepod for a few months, which was a homemade radio show where we had a different 'theme' every night, picked a dozen or so songs that fit said theme, and talked about them, with some healthy doses of self-deprecating humor. Then we missed one week because of unfortunate scheduling and never returned as of this moment. That was already about 11 months ago. Then I wrote some 'reviews' on Rateyourmusic, which I still do here and there. I put quotes on 'reviews' because rather than any critique, it's basically Twaddle (it's all just how I talk... it's all relative, man) on a website that actually receives hits. I had two reviews featured on the front page: one for Bad Company's debut album (the first post I submitted) and one for Sly Stone's High on You. That means nothing, and is even more sad when you (I) take into account that not only will no one care about any of that, but no one will even read it... but I thought it was cool, at least. Anyway, as my Rateyourmusic posts are basically Twaddle, but for albums instead of songs, I may start posting them here sometime to get this blog running again. Or I will post this and forget about it.

*****

Anyway, the whole point of this post is, there is a Fleetwood Mac tribute album coming out soon. For some reason, it's been on my mind a lot, which is weird since I usually couldn't care less about this kind of stuff. As of now, seven of the seventeen tracks are available on the official page.

The interesting thing about this album is that there are quite a few 'hip' acts contributing. You know, 'indie pop', whatever that is. Rather fittingly, then, many of the covers are from the Tusk album, which is sort of like Fleetwood Mac's 'indie' sounding album, decades before that sound existed. I'm mostly indifferent towards most of what I've heard, other than Karen Elson's frightening, beautiful version of Gold Dust Woman and Billy Gibbons' (!) acoustic, vaguely stoner rock cover of Oh Well. I know nothing about Lykki Li other than the fact that her name is hilarious, and that her Silver Springs cover is alright but abuses the echo chamber effect more than anything else I have ever heard, in true indie fashion I guess... and the MGMT cover of Future Games is hilarious in the most deadly serious, 'artistic', never-ending way. I'm glad they included a Bob Welch song on the album, though.

The weirdest cover, to me, was Best Coast's version of Rhiannon. I still am not sure who Best Coast are. I always get them mixed up with Beach House. I probably wouldn't have so much trouble if I cared more. Whoever they are, I don't really care for their take on Rhiannon, and even though I'm glad the chick is a huge fan (and I can kinda see where she's coming from, according to an article I will post later) I think they missed the point and vibe of the original song. But what do I know, they're an underground sensation, apparently; and I'm ranting on my blog with two followers, both of which are defunct accounts.

Stevie Nicks wrote Rhiannon a few months before she and Lindsey Buckingham joined Fleetwood Mac. The story is, she read the name in a book, liked the name enough to write a song based around the name 'in ten minutes', later finding out the name Rhiannon originated with a Welsh witch/goddess with the name, and that her lyrics fit the description of said witch perfectly.

This is the very first live performance of Rhiannon, by Buckingham Nicks in late 1974, before they joined Fleetwood Mac.

Fleetwood Mac recorded Rhiannon for their first album with their new lineup (the regulars - Fleetwood and the McVies - and Buckingham/Nicks) and even though it seems to have already been near-perfected in the BN days, the final studio version adds a different edge to the song, replacing the threatening pagan stomping of the BN version with a Californian, jazzy backing that sounds like the soundtrack to a succubus encounter. Both approaches fit the lyrics perfectly, yet in different ways.

Studio version. This was the first song on a FM album to showcase the three part harmonies of Stevie, Lindsey and Christine McVie, mainly in the chorus. That part never gets old. It just sounds so BIG.

'Single version' - The mix is oh so slightly different, most notably on the lead guitar stuff during the choruses. I hear this version on what used to be the oldies/soft rock station.

Just guitar and vocals (again, listen to those harmonies in the chorus, and Stevie's own high harmonies in the second verse). The multitracks for this song are out there, but besides this video I don't think they're on Youtube yet.

I guess Rhiannon was kind of the beginning of Stevie Nicks developing her dark, 'witchy' style. I remember watching an interview where she felt kind of useless in the band at first, as she was kind of added as an afterthought (the band was mainly after Lindsey Buckingham), being the only member of a five piece/three lead vocal band who didn't play an instrument onstage, and had to find a way to coexist without becoming obsolete, too flashy/showy, or overshadowing Christine McVie, the other female in the band (since women in bands were often seen as more of a novelty than just a part of life). In that sense, Rhiannon kind of hinted towards some of her darker songs, like Gold Dust Woman, Sisters of the Moon, etc.

It seems like immediately after Fleetwood Mac started touring with this lineup (which, of course, later became known as the Rumours lineup), Rhiannon became one of their live highlights, and Stevie's showcase of sorts. Where the studio version has a mellow, sort of mournful guitar solo after the "taken by the sky" section, during live performances it turns into a violent guitar freakout before winding down for the 'dreams unwind love's a state of mind' part. On the studio version it fades out here, and live... well:

By far the best live version of Rhiannon I've ever seen, and they're all pretty amazing to begin with.

So anyway, Rhiannon was the song that finally made the band superstars, everybody knows it and loves it, millions of old women dress like Stevie Nicks because of it, and you already know all of that. I guess one of those Stevie Nicks superfans eventually gave birth to the girl from Best Coast, who is a huge fan herself. I can't fault this broad for saying things like "I'm sure Fleetwood Mac are aware this record is happening. Maybe they'll hear it and think it's cool, and then Stevie Nicks will want to be my best friend", and her comment that she prefers covers that aren't exactly like the original is appreciated. But I'm a dick and I don't like their cover.

Here is a list, in no particular order, of my favorite aspects of the original, never mind all the extra stuff they did live:

- The guitar riff (I've read that Stevie came up with it; who knows for sure)
- The way the bass acts as a counter-melody to the guitar
- The almost off-beat drums, in typical Mick Fleetwood fashion
- The jazzy, sensual keyboard in the background throughout the song
- The switch from minor to major, and back again, through the 'all your life...' part
- The famous high note in the aforementioned section ('all your life')
- The chorus harmonies, and the high wordless harmonies in the verses and outro

This cover has none of these things. I understand the desire to rework the song, so not every part has to be the same, but the Best Coast cover is three chords, C-F-G, all the way through. No A minor anywhere (the chord that most of the melody is in), no "minor fall, major lift", nothing... all played through the track's three minutes in an annoying staccato rhythm that is in just about every 'indie pop' song out there. At the very end, the drums switch from the relentless 'boom-tch-boom-tch' to a rhythm closer to that of Mick Fleetwood's, so there is that. Otherwise, I appreciate Best Coast's love for Fleetwood Mac, but their cover kind of represents everything I hate about that style of music, from the whimsical, playful, 'artsy' side of indie bullcrap (the MGMT cover of Future Games representing everything I hate about the pretentious 'artsy' side of indie bullcrap) I definitely prefer the original Rhiannon. But at least it's better than this:

It's just so bad. Why did this happen.

While reading about Rhiannon on Wikipedia, I found out that apparently Hole covered it or something. I didn't listen to it. Bob Welch, of all people, recorded a cover for an album around 2006 or so. I cannot find it anymore but I remember it was pretty interesting. The music was almost trip hop and his voice had a weird vocoder-type effect.

Anyway, twaddle. See you in a year and a half.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Tea For One

The sixteen version of myself did little other than listen to a lot of Led Zeppelin. A LOT. By that point I had acquired all their studio releases, assimilated every song they put out, and was (still am to some extent) an avid bootleg collector. I was also a moderator on the Achilles Last Stand forum when I was 15 but now I'm just bragging.

There were a few songs of theirs I couldn't quite get into, though. Hot Dog was and is the main offender, and I never quite dug Boogie with Stu, even though I know neither were serious songs. I didn't really care for Tea For One either. I thought Since I've Been Loving You did everything Tea For One tried to and then some, and it was just a slow, dragging letdown after the wonderful opening section that has nothing to do with the rest of the song.



I DO love the opening, though. It's 21 seconds of why they are the greatest band ever to me. That riff. It's more proof of the genius of Jimmy Page.

So anyway, one day I was sitting around the house, depressed and full of angst because the opposite gender was getting me down. I remember wanting to listen to the most depressing song I knew, and I put in Presence and went straight to this song and even though I didn't like it up until that point, I was instantly hooked. I "got" the song, right there. I listened to it over and over in the basement, just laying there in teenage misery.

Soon after, I discovered that it was similar to Since I've Been Loving You because they tried to recreate the vibe, to see how they would approach it differently six years later. I'm really not sure which one I prefer. SIBLY (sorry) has those crazy vocals and one of my favorite solos, but TFO has one of Robert Plant's most personal performances and yet another favorite solo (but for different reasons).

While they were recording Presence, Robert Plant was confined to a wheelchair because of a car crash he and his family were in. The story is that he wrote the lyrics while he was sitting in a hospital bed and his wife was in critical condition in a hospital in another country (Greece?) because she had a rare blood type and had to get it from her sister there or something along those lines. Whether I got the story right or not, Robert Plant has said that this song was the closest he ever got to being a "true" blues singer.

Sitting, looking at the clock
Time moves so slow
I've been watching for the hands to move
Until I just can't look no more

To sing a song for you, I recall you used to say
"Oh baby this one's for we two", which in the end is you anyway

There was a time that I stood tall, in the eyes of other men
But by my own choice I left you, and now I can't get back again

How come twenty-four hours, sometimes seem to slip into days?
A minute seems like a lifetime, baby when I feel this way


I recently (ten minutes ago) read about Jimmy Page's apprehension about recording the guitar solo because it had to be perfect. And it is. It's long and depressing and every note matters. At this point he was hooked on heroin, so they say, but his playing on Presence is as good as ever. Maybe a little sloppier but it fits. The brilliance was still intact.

And as for John Bonham, the whole album is almost like a guide for what made him such a great drummer. He has crazy fills and beats in every song except this one, which shows his masterful restraint with the style. The ghost notes and little triplet hits throughout are great... it would have been cool to hear him play with a jazz band.



This is a recording of a rehearsal jam that was later slowed waaaaayyy down and turned into Tea For One. The music is very similar, just faster and more in-your-face, and it sounds like Robert Plant is just improvising his part. It's only two minutes but better than 99.9% of the rest of the blues in my opinion.

They never played Tea For One live, even though Since I've Been Loving You became very Tea For One-ish at shows from 1977 on, and Jimmy Page played bits of both solos live. However, Page and Plant played it a few times in the mid-90s.



Anyone who thinks Jimmy Page lost it (or Mr. Plant for that matter) should watch this. Also Michael Lee was a really good drummer. Watch him here and then look up the video of Days of the New on Letterman. He looks just like Travis Meeks in that video. Anyway.

Oh. Also Joe Bonamassa did a good cover of this song. You can look it up if you want.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Black Rain

So Soundgarden reunited earlier this year. Everyone (including myself) thought they announced their reunion right at midnight on January 1st, but it turns out they were apparently just announcing the launch of an official website, but whatever the case was, they DID get back together at some point. They've played a handful of shows and also released a retrospective. That's right, a RETROSPECTIVE, not a new album. Why would they make a "new" album with Black Hole Sun and Spoonman and stuff like that on it...?

Anyway, there was one sort of brand new song that was released with Telephantasm, that being Black Rain. Sort of new because it was a half-finished demo from the Badmotorfinger days in 1991 that was rediscovered, rewritten and partially re-recorded by the band this year.



First of all, as everyone knows, the music video was directed by Brendon Small of Metalocalypse and Home Movies fame. I think it's pretty awesome.

So anyway, I love this song. At first I just figured "well, it's new (to me) Soundgarden, of course I'm excited about it, I'll get over it" but this song really is great. The stuff they did in the Badmotorfinger is some of their best, in my opinion, and I think during that time they could easily get away with making riffy showoffy songs just because they could, and this is one of them. It's basically just a bunch of great heavy guitar riffs thrown together with Chris Cornell screaming, and they get away with it.

They haven't revealed just what was re-recorded, but if I had to guess, I'd definitely say that they redid the drum track because it sounds nothing like the Badmotorfinger drum sound, it's much louder and heavier. The guitars and bass could be from 1991 or 2010 and probably still sound the same, which leaves Chris Cornell's voice. I'd say the chorus ("cry on black rain") and the wailing near the end were probably recorded this year and everything else was old, but I could be way off. Either way he hits the high notes throughout the entire song so he's still got it.

Another theory I have about the song is that it was the first incarnation of the song Fell on Black Days. I remember reading an interview from when Superunknown came out where they were saying that they had tried to work the song out in various forms for a while, and he even says "black day" before the chorus, which could also easily be switched from "cry on black rain" to "fell on black days". But again, I could be way off.

Also, I must say, this band are very underrated riff writers (they were/are all prolific songwriters). Even a long forgotten song like this one is nothing but cute, cuddly, heavy riffs, one of my favorites being the odd one that first appears in the middle and then at the very very end. You know the one.

If I could hug my love, could I trade
For your wings to cover me unless I fall
Half alive I hurt the most brilliant lie
Sleepless eyes, close the light
Death's the mind wide open

You can’t stutter when you’re talking with your eyes
By cutting out your tongue you save face
Feeding on the blood running from a black day

Cry on black rain, cry on black rain
Cry on black rain


They've played it live twice so far. The first time was at a release show for the latest Guitar Hero game, the other (and by far superior) was on Conan.



You'd better believe they tear it up.

I love Soundgarden.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Echoes

Pink Floyd is probably the biggest victim of my early teenage music exploration. To clarify, when I first started getting into music, almost everything I listened to was from the radio. Led Zeppelin was, and still is, my favorite, and Pink Floyd was a close, well, not second (Soundgarden...), but probably third. I listened to their mid-70s albums over and over... and over. And unlike Zeppelin, for a while I became pretty burnt out on some of their stuff from Dark Side of the Moon through the Wall (well, minus Animals). I still love the songs I always loved, which is most of them, but the ones I don't like (Welcome to the Machine, most of the second half of the Wall) can really get on my nerves after a while.

HOWEVVEEERRRRRRRR, I still like the other eras of the band as much as I always did, maybe more, now that I've dug a lot deeper since I was 15 or so. I'm still not too familiar with the post-Wall stuff. I didn't like the Final Cut, and while I like the radio songs from the time after Roger Waters left (On the Turning Away, Learning to Fly, etc) I've never listened to the albums. The Syd Barrett stuff is great too, of course, but lately I've really been getting into the early 70s stuff, the somewhat more obscure releases post-Syd and pre-Dark Side.

As you probably figured out, this post is about Echoes, which is most likely my favorite Pink Floyd song. Maybe. If not it's up there. It's a long one, too, over 23 minutes. I decided to see if it was their longest song, but according to Wikipedia, Atom Heart Mother (which is several not-so-connected songs and some avant-garde stuff) is 24 minutes and the combined tracks of Shine on You Crazy Diamond is 26 minutes long. But I guess that doesn't really matter, I was just checking for my own good. The point is, it's a lengthy number, yet it rarely bores me.

Meddle is kind of a weird album. The first three songs are good, and pretty normal for a Pink Floyd album, what with the usual soft trippiness and whatnot. The next two songs are not quite as serious, which is kind of unexpected. Then this comes on as the last song which makes the album even more bizarre, but ends it on a great note.



I'm very glad I found this video, which not only is the full version of the song in one video, but synced with the final scene in 2001: A Space Odyssey, where it was supposed to be in the film, but by then they began to refuse allowing their music to be used in movies due to previous failed efforts. However, they apparently regretted not letting the song be used after watching the movie, and I can see why. This video is pretty much insane.

I could pretty much just listen to that first note forever. I don't know why it's so perfect but it is. I always like listening to how their songs slowly build up, including this one. The first high note over and over, into the seagull guitars in the background and the high note turning into melodies (apparently it's a keyboard recorded through a Leslie speaker, giving it the weird swirly sound), then it begins. This band was so great at ambient music. The verses are kind of a precursor to later songs like Breathe, and as usual, David Gilmour's vocals sound great, and Rick Wright's too!

One of my favorite parts is THE RIFF, the one that serves as the part where a chorus would be. The part that was ripped off for Phantom of the Opera, but was done much better in this song.

Overhead the albatross hangs motionless upon the air
And deep beneath the rolling waves
In labyrinths of coral caves
The echo of a distant tide
Comes willowing across the sand
And everything is green and submarine.

And no-one called us to the land
And no-one knows the wheres or whys
But something stirs and something tries
And starts to climb towards the light

Strangers passing in the street
By chance two separate glances meet
And I am you and what I see is me
And do I take you by the hand
And lead you through the land
And help me understand the best I can

And no-one calls us to move on
And no-one forces down our eyes
And no-one speaks and no-one tries
And no-one flies around the sun

Cloudless everyday you fall upon my waking eyes
inviting and inciting me to rise
And through the window in the wall
Come streaming in on sunlight wings
A million bright ambassadors of morning

And no-one sings me lullabies
And no-one makes me close my eyes
And so I throw the windows wide
And call to you across the sky


I have no clue what it means but I love it. The oceanic sound of the first verse, the "airy" sound of the last one, and the fact that the music has a sound somewhere between the ocean and in the sky. I have my stupid theories as to what it could be about, but it's probably way off. It fits perfectly with the music so that's great enough for me.

So after the first two verses it goes into one of Mr. Gilmour's great guitar solos that sounds something like a mix of a pterodactyl, space, and a dentist drill. The solo builds and builds until 7 minutes in, when it goes into my other favorite part, the funky section, which is something else they did very well. The guitar solo comes back in with his usual reverby spaciness. By the 11th minute the funk descends into the creepy ambient seagull section, which may be the only song in that style of music that you should ever listen to because it does it perfectly. It sets a perfect frightening lost at sea atmosphere. Or something. lolz

Around 15 and a half minutes it goes back to the intro section, with an extra chord hanging throughout. Slowly everything builds back up, sounding sort of like One of These Days, the first song on Meddle. Eventually (around 18 minutes) the great echoed (HAHAHAHA) guitar melody comes in, yet another favorite moment, and then into the last verse, RIFF, and then the outro with the keyboard and guitar trading lines, then the weird rising whooshing sound fading into the end.

I have a weird memory attached to this song. I used to go to school at College of the Ozarks in the first few months of 2008 and worked at the restaurant at the Keeter Center. I hated working there so much. The specifics of the job itself won't be discussed here, but one day I was really having a terrible time and felt like I was worth of nothing. I couldn't do anything right and my bosses liked to point it out, and I really needed to calm down. So I went outside to my car (which was a BIG NO NO) and listened to all of Echoes to be calmed down (I was in a pretty big Pink Floyd phase at the time). My stress pretty much disappeared while the song was playing. I decided not to go back in and just waited for my next class. And that's my not so exciting story.

Sorry to go on about this one for so long, but it's really a masterpiece. Not that the other songs I wrote about weren't, but this one is much longer, harhar.

Since I'm so predictable, here is a live version, the only one I recall ever hearing, and maybe the only one anyone ever needs to hear, the Live at Pompeii version.





By the way, that echoey guitar part about 3 minutes in on the second video of the live take sounds like something from an old Sonic game. It's cool... ANYWAY...

I could go on some more, but I think I have long enough. I'll let the song speak for itself from here.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Soul to Squeeze

To be honest, I wasn't intending on making my next blog about this band, I had another one in mind, but I got caught up in one of my late night Youtube excursions and here I am now. I love this song, and I love this band (the Chili Peppers), much to the dismay of most of my musician friends. I can't really think of another band that is so controversial amongst me and my musician friends. I don't know if it's because they're so mainstream and that makes them uncool or whatever, but I don't care, they're still one of my favorites.



So, anyway, Soul to Squeeze is one of those songs I must have heard sometime in my youth and it always stuck in my brain, because when I first started getting into the Chili Peppers (which I remember being a very conscious decision before a high school jazz band performance at a basketball game... "I really want to find a new band to get into. Hmm, I like most of what I've heard from the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Let's try this Blood Sugar Sex Magik!") that one didn't spring to mind. But very early on in my fandom, when I was still gathering their discography, Soul to Squeeze was always mentioned as a favorite amongst fans, so I listened to it and it instantly got to me, as if I'd heard it before (which I most likely had) and it brought me back to being a little kid.

This was recorded for the aformentioned Blood Sugar, but it ended up being rejected for the album because they didn't want it to be dragged down by too many soft songs (considering their previous four albums had NO soft songs) so it was demoted to B-side status, then John Frusciante left the band, then it was on the Coneheads soundtrack and became a hit, so they made a video (which is why John isn't in said video), etc.

Anyway, I love the way the bass and guitar parts work together. Flea and John are known for that, but this is one of the best examples of their chemistry. The bassline was probably one of his most subdued at that point but it is really melodic and still carries the song. At the risk of sounding like a pretentious dick, I think this is one of the songs that proved what a master he really is at his "craft" or whatever they say. And the guitar mostly strums the chords throughout but he always manages to still make it sound great instead of your average idiot playing through the Back in Black chords over and over. I like that organ that peeks through every so often also.

I also like how John just plays the vocal melody for the solo and yet it isn't tacky or some sort of anti-solo, like Smells Like Teen Spirit. In fact that solo and the bridge immediately afterward are my favorite parts of the song; it builds up to that point so well.

And I like the vocals. Anthony is an interesting sort because he can sometimes write some really wonderful things and sometimes he will write things that make me want to strangle him. But I love what he did with this song. And while I'm at it I like the drumbeat too, and the offbeat snare hit Chad does throughout the verses. So yes, I love everything about this song, even the "Doo doo doo doo dingle zing a dong bone Ba-di ba-da ba-zumba crunga cong gone bad" thing, whatever that means.

Where I go I just don't know
I got to got to gotta take it slow.
When I find my peace of mind
I'm gonna give you some of my good time.

It's bitter baby,
And it's very sweet.
I'm on a rollercoaster,
but I'm on my feet.
Take me to the river,
Let me on your shore.
I'll be coming back baby,
I'll be coming back for more.

Doo doo doo doo dingle zing a dong bone
Ba-di ba-da ba-zumba crunga cong gone bad

I could not forget
But I will not endeavor
Simple pleasures aren't as special
But I won't regret it never.


The Chili Peppers made a "documentary" about the making of Blood Sugar and there's a section showing the recording of the rhythm guitar and vocals. I didn't post it since it's basically a couple minutes of the song that you already heard. If you're interested you can look for it though. Haha.

As I always do, though, here are a million live versions for you. This band has some songs where I could listen to a million different live takes of it and still not be bored because of the millions of stages they've gone through over the decades, and this is one of them. Even though this song came out in 1991, as far I know they didn't start playing it live until 1998, when John Frusciante rejoined.

So here are a million different videos of them playing Soul to Squeeze. You don't have to watch them. In fact I'm glad you even read this far.

This one is from one of their first shows with John back in the band. They seem kind of uncomfortable playing it but the meekness is what I like about it.



More recent, 2006 I believe.



And in comparison to the first one, this is the last time they played it with the John lineup, in 2007. Not their last show with him but one of them. The mood for this one is a downer (like most of their last shows) but they tear it up in the solo, as the kids say.



Sorry for posting so many videos of this song, but I really love it. I wish I could have gotten to see them play it live...

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Rotten Apple

Admittedly I hadn't listened to Alice in Chains for a long time until today. Well, I had, on the radio and at random while choosing records to play, but I hadn't entered a phase for a while. Earlier I was playing guitar to various songs and I ended up at Alice in Chains eventually, one of those songs being Rotten Apple.

Facelift, Dirt and the self-titled album are all great, but the fact that they were able to make an album like Jar of Flies along with all the heavy stuff is why they're one of my favorite bands. I'd probably have to say that Rotten Apple is my favorite song from Jar of Flies, but the entire album is so consistent and near-perfect, despite how short it is (which kind of helps it in a weird bittersweet way).



I think their greatest asset (and secret weapon) was subtelty. Sure, they ROCK and they're loud and everything but even their heaviest songs usually have something else going on that you don't quite notice, something that adds to the atmosphere. I think this song is incredibly heavy, though I don't necessarily mean loud. It's more like a heavy on your soul or something hippie-ish like that. Doesn't that guitar almost sound like David Gilmour? And not just because of the talkbox, though I do have to point out that Jerry Cantrell is the man for using it in the most non-cheesy way ever, and actually making it sound "beautiful" and whatnot, as opposed to gimmicky.

Also there are only three basslines in the entire seven minute song and they're all amazing. I believe this is one of the first songs the band wrote with Mike Inez, and as BA as Mike Starr was, this is a great first impression for Mike 2.

Everyone likes to believe that every Alice in Chains song is about drugs, whether Layne Staley wrote the words or not. I'm pretty sure he wrote them for this song (he seemed to become the "main" lyricist around this time) but I don't know if it's about drugs or not. He seems to also have several songs about God (God Am, Get Born Again) and I definitely see some obvious Biblical imagery throughout. You know, eat of the apple, uh oh! Now innocence is over, etc. Maybe it's relating it to heroin LULZ! I won't dwell too much on the meaning because too many people desecrate their songs by blindly relating them to drugs. But the lyrics ARE good in this one. Layne Staley had a way of saying a lot by NOT saying a lot, you know?

Innocence is over
Ignorance is spoken
Confidence is broken
Sustenance is stolen
Arrogance is potent

What I see is unreal
I've written my own part
Eat of the apple, so young
I'm crawling back to start

I repent tomorrow
I suspend my sorrow

What I see is unreal
I've written my own part
Eat of the apple, so young
I'm crawling back to start

A romance is fallen
Recommend you borrow


And that's it (besides a bunch of "hey ah nah nah"s), over seven minutes. But that's all it needs. This is one of those songs where the minimalism makes it what it is.



This is a video of the one known time Alice in Chains (with Layne) played Rotten Apple. The words get kind of mixed up and it looks like they were fairly unsure with the song, which may be why they didn't play it much (also they didn't play very many shows post-1994 anyway). When I was waiting in line to see the reformed band in Columbia, we could hear them doing a soundcheck and they jammed on this song for a few minutes. Everyone in line stopped their conversations to listen, it was really cool. They've also played it a couple times this year, and there are videos but the quality isn't that great (the audio I mean, not the performance).